🐳 12,021 items were approved and added to the database in the past week!

Zork: The Great Underground Empire

aka: Zork, Zork I, Zork I: Le Grand Empire des TÊnèbres, Zork I: The Great Underground Empire, Zork I: The Great Underground Empire , Zork: The Great Underground Empire - Part I
Moby ID: 50

[ All ] [ Amiga ] [ Amstrad CPC ] [ Amstrad PCW ] [ Apple II ] [ Atari 8-bit ] [ Atari ST ] [ Browser ] [ Commodore 128 ] [ Commodore 16, Plus/4 ] [ Commodore 64 ] [ CP/M ] [ DOS ] [ Macintosh ] [ Mainframe ] [ PC Booter ] [ PC-8000 ] [ PC-98 ] [ Tatung Einstein ] [ TRS-80 ] [ TRS-80 CoCo ]

Critic Reviews add missing review

Average score: 84% (based on 7 ratings)

Player Reviews

Average score: 3.8 out of 5 (based on 61 ratings with 9 reviews)

It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

The Good
Zork is one of the first in its genre. And it is quite enjoyable, even to this day. It has witty humour, interesting puzzles and a strange yet interesting setting to explore.

The Bad
Zork's main shortcoming is how some of the actions you perform can lead the game into a dead end. Don't leave any candles burning, for example. You might need them later and they actually do get shorter over time. Also use your batteries sparsely because they might be useful later on. Things like these can make the game rather frustrating, because you get no warning of their importance and when you lose them the game just continues. So if you save your game, there's no turning back anymore and you have to start over.

Some of the solutions for puzzles are also rather obscure, but I won't spoil anything here.

Though the game has plenty of back-story and setting, there is no real story that drives the player. No real motive, except for gathering treasure that result in a numerical score.

The Bottom Line
Zork is worth playing. There's quite some funny bits, and interesting puzzles. If not just for its historical relevance as one of the first text adventures to reach commercial success.

DOS · by vedder (72435) · 2008

A great introduction to interactive fiction.

The Good
Great images/descriptions, a huge world to explore, a variety of puzzles ranging from simple to agonizingly difficult, a great text parser, and enough random events to make it replayable.

The Bad
The thief, who had a tendency to steal your items and move things around (even before you could find them, sometimes). Also, the main light source is limited and, unless you plan ahead, you can get yourself irrevocably stuck in the dark. But these are just minor annoyances.

The Bottom Line
Zork I was my first REAL computer game. I originally played it on an old TRS-80 Model III with 4k of RAM. Most of the puzzles were challenging enough to keep my 10-year-old brain busy for hours, and the vivid room descriptions still create detailed images in my mind to this day. This game is truly a timeless classic... it is available as a free download (Infocom officially declared it freeware) from the Unofficial Infocom Homepage (http://www.csd.uwo.ca/Infocom/).

DOS · by Mirrorshades2k (274) · 2000

Zork?!? Zork What? Zork you too, pal.

The Good
That's what I said when I uncovered this relic from my disk box when I was eight or nine. Maybe younger. Zork? What kind of a weird name was that? It had to be a stupid action scroller, I figured. Or maybe one of those Ultima rip-off rpgs. Or maybe it was a curse-word. Back then I guess it was my surmise that in the gaming community there were only a few types of games 1) action 2) rpg 3) the sparse graphical adventure games 4) text-adventures with limited parsers. Well... I was wrong. Zork was a great game with an unparrelled (at that time) parser. There were no graphics, which put me off at first and it took me a while to discover that I didn't even need my joystick. Sadly, I set it aside and began tentatively typing orders. And, as I deciphered more and more commands, it showed me the light. The landscape surrounding the seemingly innocent white house was inhabited by few characters, most memorably the thief (with his trademark stilleto), a cyclops, and a troll. The descriptions provoked wonderful images in my mind. So I was content to wander around and push buttons rather than solve the puzzles.

The Bad
I dunno. Everyone should take a look at it once. It might not be your thing, but it's still a large chunk of gaming history.

The Bottom Line
CAUTION: Zork could spark a love for interactive fiction. I didn't even know what I was doing, but somehow I managed to find my way to a certian room and type [jump off the cliff], and I've never looked back since.

DOS · by rs2000 (13) · 2001

The most eclectic and interesting of the series

The Good
Zork: The Underground Empire shows its long gestation period on seventies mainframes. Unlike the two immediate sequels, Z:TUG is wildly eclectic and rambling, with very little overall structure. Surprisingly, this is to its advantage. From the famous opening, down into the passages, through some nastily ingenious puzzles to the final confrontation, Z:TUG retains a strange, compressed energy. Completing it is extremely satisfying, and for years being able to say "I finished Zork" was a badge of merit in gaming circles.

The Bad
The problems with Zork are really only those of text adventures as a whole. The puzzles are frustrating, it's possible to be stuck at four or five different points simultaneously, and gamers used to such extravagances as "graphics" and "sound" may find this blast from the past annoying and pointless.

The Bottom Line
Zork is both an excellent introduction to text adventuring and a piece of computer-history royalty in its own right. Despite the myriad other Infocom releases, and the release of two immediate sequels, Zork has a flavour and excitement all its own.

DOS · by Colin Rowsell (43) · 2002

Old is Gold

The Good
Very deep game, with hundreds of room to explore and days worth of play material. Engaging story line across the series. The text parser is surprisingly advanced for its age, with contextual parsing.

Another positive aspect about this particular text parser is that there are so many fun things you can do and so many extra commands that do not help to advance the story in any way but yield some very funny results. Try typing JUMP or SCREAM or ATTACK THE HOUSE; type LOOK AT ME, KISS ME, TAKE ME, and EAT ME for more laughs. If you’re the masochistic type, there are plenty of ways to kill yourself off with the various commands at your disposal.

Superb and detailed writing helps set the atmosphere and paint a vivid picture but is just vague enough to allow you to use your imagination.

Humour is abound in this game(provided you type in absurd commands) and I discover a new dialogue every time I replay it.

The Bad
Honestly, this is as close to perfection as it gets. But if you’re not fond of text parser, prefer objectives clearer than “go get some treasure,” and dislike such a great degree of freedom to explore, then maybe you won’t like the game as much. If the lack of graphics and sound, the need to draw maps (or use someone else’s, especially for navigating the mazes), the limited amount of items allowed in your inventory, the possibility of dooming yourself to failure without realizing it, and the lack of a driving story is a deal breaker for you, then maybe skip this one.

The Bottom Line
Perfect for all types of gamers. Play it blind if you want a challenge. If you're a novice, the official maps and manual are a great help, which makes the game much easier while still presenting a fun enough challenge. Include save options so you don't have to start over again an again.

I bought my copy from GOG, which comes with a DOS-Box, so no setup required.

DOS · by Sam Vulcan (18) · 2020

You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a great game here.

The Good
Zork: The Great Underground Empire (also called Zork I) is a classic text adventure game from text legends Infocom. The sparse plot casts you as a nameless adventurer placed without ceremony near the entrance to a vast underground empire. Your goal: Explore and get stuff.

As simple as it is, the game pulls you in from the beginning. There is a real sense of a large world worth discovering. Getting to the next room is a goal in itself.

Probably the most famous aspect of Zork is its humor. The game is full of delightful little jokes and details. For instance, famously, when the player enters an area which is pitch dark they are warned that they could be eaten by a grue. Asking what a grue is yields hilarity.

The lack of graphics can be an asset if you allow yourself to be sucked into the game. There is a certain experience to entering the theater of your imagination and Infocom knows how to guide you there. Even if a graphical version of the game were available, it would lack that character which is apart of Zork's very nature.

The Bad
There is really only one issue I have with Zork, though it is a big one: It is possible to "break" the game and not know it.

In other words, actions which you take can make it so that you cannot win the game. And, as stated, the game will not tell you that this has happened.

The Bottom Line
Zork is a very challenging but very fun game. It is a legend among text adventures and a game which every gamer should try at least one.

DOS · by Steelysama (82) · 2009

Great game, my favourite text-only, text adventure

The Good
The language of this text adventure is excellent and it really gets the imagination going. It's of course greatly influenced by the Colossal Cave game from the '70s made by Will Crowther, a cave explorer(spelunker). Zork 1 has detailed geographical descriptions of the caves, forests, mountains and other places you explore, which gives the game a slightly educational feel. Much like Colossal Cave, within all the realism is fantasy and mythology, and the game also has a strong sense of humour. One other notable thing is the intelligence of the parser, which will understand quite a bit of input, sadly a lot more than many other text adventure games.

The Bad
While I think the problem solving is more reasonable than in the next two Zork games, the problems are still a bit strange and it could take some people years to figure out how to complete the game. Some of the solutions were satisfying to discover, while others I thought were silly and hurt the game.

The Bottom Line
Well I suppose it's a big ask to expect people to play text adventures today, but if anyone ever wanted to take the challenge of playing a game with no graphics, this, along with Planet Fall, I'd recommend. It'd be very satisfying to see a young gamer somehow get past the natural dismissiveness and see the good in the game.

DOS · by Andrew Fisher (699) · 2017

A hollow voice says "Zork"

The Good
A very creative game that sucks you into its adventure without the need for any graphics. Collect treasures from the dungeon beneath the white house in the woods while dealing with the traps, denizens & puzzles of the Great Underground Empire. Beware the thief who will steal from you as well. Wasted many hours to this game at a friends house trying to suss out how to navigate the maze of twisty little passages, all alike or how to open the large egg encrusted with precious jewels. This game will make you think not just about what to do next but how & in what order it should be done.

The Bad
No graphics will be too retro for many & some of the puzzles are near impossible without a walkthrough.

The Bottom Line
The first interactive fiction game from Infocom. Completing this adventure back in the '80s was a feat of legend. Don't be eaten by a grue!

DOS · by Grumpy Quebecker (1199) · 2023

The one that stated it all for Infocom

The Good
Previously, I had only played Scott Adams' Text Adventures, which were only 16K, and supported 2 words (Get Rope). I loved those, but when Zork came out, it blew me away, and raised the bar on Intereactive Fiction.

The Bad
I was a bit put off by the AMOUNT of text for each description, since I was used to the bare minimum. But I soon got used to it.

The Bottom Line
A classic that everyone should play

DOS · by Tony Van (2796) · 1999

Contributors to this Entry

Critic reviews added by Scaryfun, Sam Vulcan, Patrick Bregger, Pseudo_Intellectual, Mr Creosote.