Knights and Merchants: The Shattered Kingdom

The Good
Graphics wise the game isn't too hard on the eyes. Units can be formed into formations. Honestly I can’t think of too much to say about what I liked about this game, truly mediocre.

The Bad
Basically the pace of the game nailed this game in the coffin. I remember playing the demo of this game when it came out and thinking that it wasn't too bad, maybe worth a play. After later revisiting the game, the pace is simply too slow to keep the attention.

The tedious process of road building exacerbates this point. Each building in the game is required to have an adjoining road to it, and each stone slab must be built. Also the process of feeding troops is tedious and also time consuming, each soldier requires a unit to bring food to them, so if you're planning to manage your troops away from camp for an extended period of time forget about it.

The Bottom Line
If the slow pace doesn't faze you, and a real time strategy game set in a medieval world interested you, this game just might be worth the play.

The Good
First of all the games graphics are great and smooth (even on a p133 16mb). The characters are perfectly drawn and animated. Its beautiful to look at. The music is well composed, it got a medieval sound. The whole level is alive with some animals, like fishes and wolves.

The Bad
The problem with this game is, that the gameplay is slow. First you must build a little village and this tooks a while. When you got a village you must make an army to attack the enemy. But when you got the hang of it, you may get like it. At least I do. Another thing that isn't oke, is the AI of your serves. It isn't possible to give them individual jobs. They just find something to do by themselves and guess what, it is always something that isn't important at that time. Also what I don't like about this game, that there isn't a fog of war like in Warcraft. Now you are able to see the enemies actions. Oke not before you explored their settlement.

The Bottom Line
If you like strategy games with a lot to build. Than this is your game.

The Good
Good music

Pleasant graphics

The Bad
Requires too much micromanagement

The lack of skirmish mode is something noticeable on a RTS

Troublesome combat

The Bottom Line
When I played the demo in 2000, which contained only one mission, I had a positive view of game.Nice graphics, great music, an interesting gameplay resembling The Settlers, which involved a long chain of production to reach an objective. Remembering this, I did not think twice before purchasing the game, years later, when suddenly I found for sale.

The thrill was not equal. In the the first mission, your city starts getting attacked, but from then on, the computer takes an almost passive stance, returning to the attack only a few hours later, with few units. The combat is weak, units do not move well, and even worse, after being ordered to attack, they do not accept new orders until killing the enemy unit.

The production requires a lot of economic micro-management, and after a while (the missions are long) makes the game boring. The need to feed the army periodically, is a nice idea, but also not very well developed, having a large effect in your economy, since your serfs cannot be in two places at the same time. In the end I just found out that the demo I played was from the second game, "The Peasants Rebellion", and given the similarity between both, I don't believe even the new one (that looks like just a new pack of missions with the possibility to play in skirmish mode) will get any better while playing the campaign. With all this in mind, I believe that even when it was released there were better options for the strategy genre.